1. Introduction
Burnout, as characterized by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), represents a syndrome emanating from unmanaged chronic workplace stress. It encompasses three dimensions: feelings of exhaustion or energy depletion, increased mental estrangement or negativism towards one’s work, and diminished professional effectiveness.1
Medical practitioners, especially physicians, are susceptible to higher rates of burnout compared to their counterparts in other doctoral-level fields. Training periods have been identified as the pinnacle of distress for physicians.2,3 For instance, the Medscape Physician Burnout and Depression Report-2022 noted that 47% of US-based physicians showed signs of burnout.4 Further, a meta-analysis documented a 35.7% burnout prevalence rate among medical residents, with local investigations reporting between 32% and 84.2% among family medicine residents.5–7
Burnout often coexists with destructive behaviors such as substance abuse, reduced quality of life, increased conflicts, and impaired relationships.8 Furthermore, it is associated with mental health conditions including anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, and suicidal ideation.9,10 Systematic reviews reveal that physicians experiencing burnout are twice as likely to contribute to patient safety incidents and deliver suboptimal patient care, contributing to lower patient satisfaction ratings and the compromised ability of healthcare systems to ensure high-quality, safe care.11,12
Depression, as delineated by the American Psychiatric Association, represents a significant negative affective state, manifesting as unhappiness and discontent to severe sadness, pessimism, and despondency, which interferes with daily functioning.13 As a pervasive and severe medical illness, depression adversely influences feelings, thought processes, and actions.14 It is a primary cause of global disability and a significant contributor to the worldwide disease burden.15
Resident physicians have been documented to exhibit higher depression rates compared to the general populace,16–18 with reported depression prevalence or depressive symptoms ranging between 20.9% and 43.2%.19 Among Saudi resident physicians, perceived stress is comparably high or slightly higher than global rates,20 with regional studies showing depression prevalence from 57.3% to 75.8%.21–23
Depression is a leading cause of disability globally, matching other medical conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and arthritis.24 It is strongly associated with suicidal ideation and attempts,25 and amongst resident physicians, is linked to increased medical errors and reduced patient care quality.26
Within the context of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030, primary care has been emphasized as a pivotal aspect of healthcare, specifically through family practice and the concept of gatekeeping. The family medicine residency program has been adjusted to span three instead of four years, with the curriculum competencies drawn from various international and national frameworks, as well as the New Model of Care (MOC) aimed at achieving Saudi healthcare transformation by 2030.
Investing in the wellness and professional values of resident physicians, who will shoulder healthcare delivery in the coming decades, is essential for fostering organizational immunity against workforce shortages, patient harm, and mistrust. Hence, the current study focuses on exploring the prevalence of depression and burnout among family medicine residents.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Considerations
This study received institutional review board approval from King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Participant anonymity was preserved by excluding identifiers from the survey, and a consent form was collected alongside each survey.
2.2. Study Design and Setting
This investigation utilizes a cross-sectional study design, executed in 2021, through the implementation of a self-administered survey among family medicine residents practicing in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia.
2.3. Sample Selection and Sampling Technique
The sample incorporates family medicine residents in Riyadh. Stratified random sampling was used to ensure a representative sample across all residency program levels (R1-R3). Inclusion criteria consisted of family medicine residents in Riyadh willing to participate in the study. Conversely, exclusion criteria covered family medicine residents practicing outside Riyadh, senior registrars, consultants, residents with a history of mental disorders before the residency program, and those not willing to participate in the study.
2.4. Data Collection Procedures and Tools
The data collection process entailed a three-part survey:
Part 1: Demographics
This part collected demographic data, including age, gender, residency level, marital status, presence of chronic medical conditions, and history of mental disorders.
Part 2: Burnout Assessment
This section incorporated the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) questionnaire, developed by Maslach and Jackson in 1986.1 This self-report questionnaire consists of 22 items assessing three subscales: Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and Personal Accomplishment (PA). Each participant rated their job-related feelings on a 0-6 scale, with “0” indicating “never” experiencing such feelings and “6” indicating “everyday” occurrences. Mean subscale scores were calculated, corresponding to low, moderate, or high levels of EE, DP, and PA based on established scoring guides.
Part 3: Depression Assessment
The third part utilized the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9, a previously validated assessment instrument.2 Responses were collected on a 4-point Likert scale, where “0” denotes “Not at all” and “3” indicates “Nearly every day.” These scores were aggregated to classify the severity of depression among the participants.
2.5 Statistical Analysis
The study employed descriptive statistics to summarize the participants’ characteristics and prevalence of burnout and depression (percentages, mean±SD). A correlation test was used to assess the relationship between depression and burnout. A regression model was developed to identify the predictors of burnout and depression, considering a p-value of <0.05 as statistically significant.
3. Results
A total of 213 family medicine residents participated in the study with a mean age of 26.85±1.42 years. More than half of the subjects were males 53.3% and aged > 26. Further details are shown in Table 1.
Slightly more than half and 18.3% of the respondents indicated a moderate level of EE. However, the family medicine residents’ EE mean subscale score was 21.10±9.38 indicating moderate levels. The majority of the family medicine residents 71.4% reported a higher level of DP. The DP mean subscale score was 15.44±7.69 indicating a high level. Moreover, all family medicine residents showed high PA levels with a mean score of 11.46±6.33. About 10% of the family medicine residents reported moderately severe and severe depression; however, the mean PHQ-9 scale score was 6.03±5.10 indicating mild depression level among family medicine residents. Table 2
Table 3 displays the stratification between burnout and respondents’ characteristics. The results showed that females have a significant (p=0.002) higher EE and significantly lower PA than males (p=0.033). Across the three domains of the MBI scale, the results showed a statistically significant difference (p <0.001) between the levels of depression. Table 3
A statistically significant difference was found between family medicine residents’ gender and depression severity (p=0.001). Table 4
4. Discussion
The global prevalence of burnout and depression among healthcare workers has been well documented and is a concern in many regions worldwide. The situation is particularly pertinent among resident physicians, as they operate under significant stress due to the nature of their work, long hours, and a rigorous training regimen.27,28 The current study aimed to investigate the prevalence of depression and burnout among family medicine residents in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia, specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period marked by elevated stress and increased workload for healthcare workers.
The results of this study are noteworthy and contribute to the current understanding of burnout and depression among resident physicians, particularly during crisis periods such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The prevalence of burnout and depression among residents in the study was found to be substantial, consistent with previous research indicating high levels of burnout and depression among resident physicians worldwide.28,29
The higher emotional exhaustion (EE) in female residents observed in our study aligns with findings from previous studies that suggest women in medicine often report higher burnout rates than their male counterparts.30,31 This discrepancy may be due to a multitude of factors including gender roles, career progression, or work-life balance.
Similarly, the lower personal achievement (PA) scores among females compared to males could reflect the gender disparities prevalent in the medical field.32 This warrants further investigation, particularly into potential institutional and societal barriers that may contribute to these differences.
Our findings also showed that residents of all levels reported high levels of depersonalization (DP), and this did not significantly differ by residency level. This suggests that regardless of their experience or seniority, residents are equally likely to exhibit high DP. This aligns with prior literature highlighting the prevalence of burnout across various stages of medical training.33
Concerning age, our study did not find any significant association between age and the three domains of the MBI scale. This is an interesting finding given that prior research has suggested both younger34 and older age35 as risk factors for burnout. This discrepancy could be due to the relatively narrow age range of our study participants.
Furthermore, the association between burnout and marital status was not significant. This contrasts with previous studies which have identified marital status as a significant factor in burnout, often finding that being single or divorced is associated with higher levels of burnout.36
As anticipated, our study found a significant correlation between depression severity and all burnout domains. This correlation is well-established in the literature, highlighting that burnout and depression often coexist among healthcare professionals.37
Lastly, we found a statistically significant association between gender and depression severity, with females more likely to report depression. This is consistent with a large body of evidence indicating that women, including those in healthcare professions, are at a higher risk of depression.38
While the COVID-19 pandemic context may have amplified the reported rates of burnout and depression in our study, it is crucial to note that these issues are deeply rooted and pervasive in the medical community. Solutions necessitate long-term, systemic changes that include but are not limited to, adjusting workloads, providing mental health resources, and promoting a work culture that acknowledges and addresses mental health concerns without stigma. Further research in this field is paramount, particularly during and following periods of extreme stress such as a pandemic.
In light of these findings, there is an urgent need for effective strategies aimed at minimizing burnout and depression among family medicine residents. Such measures may include provision for regular mental health check-ups, peer support initiatives, stress management programs, and a reevaluation of the workload. Further, considering the gender differences found in burnout and depression severity, it is crucial to tailor these strategies to address the unique challenges faced by different genders. In addition, longitudinal studies are recommended to explore the evolution and causality of these symptoms throughout the residency program, as well as to evaluate the impact of the introduced countermeasures. With these proactive steps, we can help ensure the well-being of our family medicine residents, thereby contributing to better healthcare delivery in the long run.
There are several limitations to our study which should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. Firstly, the study adopted a cross-sectional design which, although effective for gauging prevalence at a specific point in time, inherently cannot establish cause-effect relationships or assess temporal trends. Thus, it’s challenging to deduce if the burnout and depression developed during the residency or if they were pre-existing conditions exacerbated by the residency. Secondly, the reliance on self-reported data may also have introduced bias, as participants could overestimate or underestimate their symptoms, leading to potential inaccuracies in the data collected. This is particularly relevant for burnout and depression, which can be influenced by individual interpretations and the stigma associated with mental health conditions. Lastly, the sampling bias may limit the generalizability of our findings. While a random stratified sampling technique was used, this was confined to Riyadh city. Hence, the findings may not be fully representative of family medicine residents in other regions of Saudi Arabia or other countries. This limitation restricts the generalizability of the study results and may affect their applicability to broader contexts.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated a high prevalence of burnout and a significant occurrence of depressive symptoms among family medicine residents in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Notably, the study identified specific demographic factors associated with these symptoms. The results are particularly important considering the COVID-19 pandemic context, which might have exacerbated the situation due to increased workload and stress. The emotional distress experienced by the family medicine residents is significant and underscores the importance of proactive measures to identify and address these issues within the medical residency framework.
Author’s contribution
Study design: AN and AB; methodology, AN, AB and IF; data collection, AN and AB; data analysis, IF and MT; writing-review and editing, AN, AB, MT and IF; supervision, IF and MT. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
Acknowledgment
We would like to extend our deepest appreciation to the family medicine residents who participated in this study. Your generous contribution of time and sharing of experiences have been instrumental in the completion of this research. Thank you for your invaluable support.
Conflict of interests
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
None